Cantai Reviews

1.0

Simply stopped loading. Doesn't even show up in the drop down menu. Buggy renderings when it was working. Useless, and Support now ghosts me. Worthless.

grubby-curlew7

1.0

Las voces se cortan en algunas ligaduras, no difieren mucho ni en calidad ni en pronunciación de otros modelos gratuitos y la voz Giovanni opera que se supone es la estrella del producto, no funciona. $300 tirados a la basura.

José Ángel

1.0.0

As a choir director, this is awesome. I'm just a bit bothered by the fact that Latin text is sung with English pronunciation

Beezart73

I paid my £14.99 subscription despite reading the negative reviews because I wanted to believe in the product. But I just have piano sounds coming out and a constant processing bar. And Musescore refuse to refund as it’s a subscription but the product fundamentally does not work. I can’t get it to do the base function Cantai is meant to do.

Partner Response: We are sorry to hear that Cantai didn't work for you and apologies for any inconvenience that has caused, our support team has reached out with a resolution for you payment and to help further diagnose the issue.
thebenedit

1.0

I love this new addition to musescore but the sounds will not load even through I have a great internet connection. Please fix this. I also think there needs to be a good amount more female vocals.

andrew.hofmann

1.0.0

I am currently unable to properly test this plugin, as the sounds do not load and playback defaults to a standard piano. Because of this, I cannot say that I received value for the money spent on this purchase. If these issues are resolved in the future, I may reconsider my opinion. At present, however, this is a negative review, as the product does not function as advertised and I did not receive what I paid for.

Partner Response: Hi there! Could you please reach out to us at MuseHub Support and include your logs so that we can investigate this further? You can find the logs under Diagnostics → Save Diagnostics File. Please submit them here: https://support.musehub.com/hc/en-gb/requests/new Thanks!
XSChris

1.0.0

I can say the app is such an amazing tool, But after a few attempts with the tool it's no longer working. It can't seem to generate online sounds anymore. Does this mean I've exceeded my weekly rendering limits or something else. Because the error message I keep getting doesn't specifically say so.

Partner Response: Hi there! Could you please reach out to us at MuseHub Support and include your logs so that we can investigate this further? You can find the logs under Diagnostics → Save Diagnostics File. Please submit them here: https://support.musehub.com/hc/en-gb/requests/new Thanks!
JasonXtrs7

1.0.0

This is not ready for general use. I supported the pre-release version, and paid for a month when out on MuseHub. Unfortunately there are persistent problems, still being discussed on their Discord channel - 'Online Sounds' incomplete processing error, bad swoops to high notes, bad or no sound on some notes. I don't mind pronunciation issues, I can fix them myself by using the right phonemes. What I don't like is reporting a bug via Musehub and getting no response. I am currently using Cantamus.app but they don't respond to support questions either, so if I ever hit a showstopper there as I have in Cantai, I don't know what else to try.

probeirne

1.0.0

I've been waiting for this for awhile, so it's awesome that it's finally hear. I write hymns and score public domain hymns to make them singable, and this helps tremendously. It is so much better than the old "oohs" and "aahs". A few issues/features that I hope will be addressed: 1.) I wish I had the ability to have the program select which verse I want it to sing. As it is, I have to score the music. Put in the lyrics for verse 1. Export the mp3. Delete the lyrics and put in the lyrics for verse 2 and rinse and repeat. It's doable, but a pain. 2.) I hope the program does a better job of singing shortened words. It really struggles with heav'n, and forgiv'n for example in the score I'm currently working on. It seems like when it doesn't know what to do, it just gives sings basically "aahs". This is really annoying as one can probably guess how often words like this show up in hymns :) Regardless, thumbs up for the program. I know it's a work in progress and progress will be made. Thanks!

miniature-corgi566

1.0

As a classical composer with great grandchildren and very little money, the fact that my low-end laptop can sing my music brings me near to tears. I could quibble about a few things, but it seems as though the developer has plans that will address those minor (to me) issues.

sophisticated-eagle827

1.0.0

It's amazing how tools are improving every single day. I've been looking for a tool like this that's compatible with Musescore and I don´t have to export xml, or cut parts, etc... It's kind of dissapointed the only laguages available are english and latín. My native language is spanish and also Irecently write something in italian and I wanted to give it a shot, I gave me an idea but of course with english accent. Also I try with some english songs and it was much better but still need to fix some bugs bc is not recognizing some words... Also, I couldn't export an mp3 file, to show a sample to someone :( I think is promising and definetely I'll keep an eye on updates, but at the moment I don't really think it is worth to pay a monthly subscription at the moment, but if we improve the languages most likely I'll be there :)

repentant-toad987

At the time of this software being released, I just so happened to have completed a choral symphony, and since I unfortunately don’t have singers at my immediate disposal (as with a lot of composers, I’m sure), it’s nice to get some immediate feedback regarding the vocal music composers write. While I’m sure that the voices will be improved upon in due time, my only main gripe is the monthly subscription; I had actually preordered a one-time paid lifetime subscription, so that I wouldn’t have to worry about putting aside money every month; this is quite detrimental, especially for the younger composers who have a specialty in choral music; other than this though, it has delivered quite beautifully for me and I can’t wait for what’s to come in the future!

MaestroHenry18

1.0.0

I’ve always wished for a product like this, so in a way it really caught my attention. Unfortunately, it doesn’t quite deliver. The biggest drawback is the monthly subscription. I might understand a one-time payment, but paying every month for something of this kind simply isn’t worth it. Another problem is the soprano range, which is surprisingly poor. And I can’t overlook the English accent present in all voices. These issues make the product feel unfinished, almost as if it wasn’t tested with real musicians in mind. If these shortcomings were addressed, I genuinely believe it could become one of the best-selling products on MuseScore. But if the developers don’t fix them, I’m certain a better competitor will take its place soon enough.

Kem_cz

1.0

It’s a very cool product that will be very useful for operatic or classical scores. Unfortunately, as a musical theatre writer, these voices aren’t helpful to me at all. This product will be a 10/10 if/when musical theatre style voices are added!

WoodsyWoods9804

1.0

Impressed by the skills putting this library together. Works very well for opera scores and the opera Cantai voices but less so for music theatre, musicals and pop (the soft and ordinary voices of the tenors and barritone are not great). Unfortunately the soprano is pitchy and strained in the upper range - Ab is not high enough for most opera scores and sopranos can hit this note without strain in the realworld. For sustained notes over multiple bars, the pitch dropped in the final bar before scooping back up to the correct note (for any of the tenors) and there are some mid-range notes that are also pitchy. Not enough choice for sopranos, mezzo and no alto or bass (hope these are coming). The online sounds have to be reloaded every time I open MuseScore - not sure about the cache notes in the manual - doesn’t seem to be the case for me as when I first open score that has Cantai already used, the default piano sound is active - using MacOS 26.1

JMJJ

1.0.0

I wholeheartedly agree that this product itself delivers exceptional results, resolving numerous issues with vocal-heavy sheet music that previously required human intervention. I am personally acquainted with several opera singers who work with this product. However, its limitations are significant. Firstly, it operates on a monthly subscription model, which creates considerable uncertainty for users. Most critically, it imposes a weekly quota of just 180 minutes. Regrettably, there is no transparency regarding how these 180 minutes are calculated, meaning users can easily exhaust their allowance when initially testing and adjusting the product. After weighing the audio quality against the cost-effectiveness, I ultimately believe the developers need to offer a more reasonable usage plan that benefits consumers. I fully acknowledge that MuseScore has consistently been a latecomer achieving technological progress, but careful consideration is required for specific market strategies. For this particular product, I personally feel that removing the quota restrictions would be the optimal solution.

Partner Response: Fixed! We’ve already increased the token limit by 10x — sorry about the initial quota being too low. It was a conservative first calculation on our side. And thanks for your kind words about the quality!
floatingpitchfork453
Cantai reviews | MuseHub